California index · last changed 18 September 2026

California data centers: what the public record shows.

Selected source-linked records are published below. This is not a complete inventory of California data centers.

5 published DataCenterData records · evidence status shown per row95 licensed directory leads · not independently verifiedCA

Explore California

Map, listings and checked facts.

Start with 95 licensed source leads, then inspect the separate public-evidence layer below. Licensed rows are not independently verified and are not a statewide census.

California map

Reported locations in California

95 licensed rows · 35 source localities · 2 map targets

Open interactive map
Source-reported points; some are approximate. Not parcel boundaries. Exact Approximate or representative Bounded nearby group
Browse 2 mapped areas as links
Map sources and method

The state outline is adapted from the U.S. Census Bureau 2025 cartographic boundary file. Facility coordinates are adapted from Compute Atlas by Edward Kubiak, edition 1.33.0, under CC BY 4.0. Outline and markers use one geographic projection before any explicitly disclosed readability offset. Exact singleton source anchors are never moved. A one-kilometre boundary tolerance prevents the simplified 1:20,000,000 outline from hiding legitimate border-area source points; farther conflicts are disclosed, not clamped. DataCenterData groups source-reported city coordinates only within a bounded map radius; the outline does not validate a facility record.

95 licensed rows34 reported city labels47 eligible organization labels

Browse all 95 rows below. Licensed rows are not independently verified and remain separate from the checked public-evidence layer.

  1. source-reported under constructionPlanned 98 MWSource updated 14 September 2026exact location
    View facility →dcd-dir-000064
  2. source-reported operationalOperational 4 MWSource updated 12 September 2026approximate location
    View facility →dcd-dir-000108

California evidence at a glance

A few checked sites

Selected public evidence, not a statewide census. Each row shows whether it is independently source-linked, attributed, or unresolved; licensed leads remain separate.

Published project / campus
5
Published facility / building
0
Attributed or unresolved rows
0
Licensed directory leads
95 not independently verified
Capacity boundary stated
4 of 5 published DataCenterData rows
Review timing
Audit through 17 September 2026 · next 17 November 2026
Known coverage gap

The GO-Biz California Business Portal incentives page could not be read: secure connection handshake failure.

Browse all 95 California licensed leads → · Why these counts differ →

Projects and Campuses

3 campus records · 2 project records. Names are as they appear on each record page.

STACK SVY03A Data Center CampusDeveloper: STACK Infrastructure constructioncampus up to 76.6 MWonsite generation planned · campus scopeProposed emergency backup-generation capacity in the CEC exemption record; not an issued air permit, IT capacity or utility load. California Energy Commission — STACK SVY03A, Docket 23-SPPE-01 →Gov. record
Gilroy Data Center constructionproject 49 MWutility request · phase scopeCity-stated Phase I connection requirement to PG&E; not critical IT capacity, campus design capacity or measured load. Gilroy Data Center by AWS — AS 20-23 →Gov. record
McLaren Data Center approvedproject · BAAQMD generator approval dated 19 August 2024; CEQAnet notice received 21 August 2024. Construction and current operation are not established by this notice. UnknownNo independently supported figure Governor's Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (LCI) / State Clearinghouse CEQAnet →Gov. record
Goodman Energy Park (GEP) data center proposedcampus · Governor's Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (LCI) / State Clearinghouse CEQAnet, SCH 2026080118; Document Type row 'NOP - Notice of Preparation of a Draft EIR'; Document Description, first sentence. The CEQAnet date label for 2026-08-05 is 'Received' - receipt of the notice by the State Clearinghouse, not a publication or posting date. California Energy Commission project page for the Vernon Backup Generating Facility, docket 25-SPPE-01, summary table row 'Project Status: Under Review'. A Notice of Preparation begins CEQA environmental review; it is not an approval, exemption, permit, entitlement, construction start or operation. up to 99 MWonsite generation planned · campus scopeProposed emergency backup generation only. The CEC page states the facility would be used exclusively to provide up to 99 MW of backup emergency generation when Vernon Public Utility electricity is unavailable. This is not IT load, utility service capacity, or permitted generation. Do not aggregate it with other figures. Governor's Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (LCI) / State Clearinghouse CEQAnet →Gov. record
Northtown Data Center (NTDC) proposedcampus · Governor's Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (LCI) / State Clearinghouse CEQAnet, SCH 2026070839; Document Type row 'NOP - Notice of Preparation of a Draft EIR'; Document Description, first sentence. The CEQAnet date label for 2026-07-21 is 'Received' - receipt of the notice by the State Clearinghouse, not a publication or posting date. California Energy Commission project page for the NorthTown Backup Generating Facility, docket 25-SPPE-02, summary table row 'Project Status: Under Review'. A Notice of Preparation begins CEQA environmental review; it is not an approval, exemption, permit, entitlement, construction start or operation. up to 97.3 MWonsite generation planned · campus scopeProposed emergency backup generation only. Both cited records describe up to 97.3 MW of backup emergency generation for the campus. This is not IT load, utility service capacity, or permitted generation, and it must not be summed with the 110 MVA substation rating. Governor's Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (LCI) / State Clearinghouse CEQAnet →Gov. record

Where the records were checked

Statewide audit pending

A few checked sites

This is not a list of every data center in the state, and the number here is not a count of them. There are almost certainly more.

Statewide coverage is not complete. The records below are sourced; a full statewide count has not been published.

State research audit window ended 17 September 2026. Individual records and claims below show their own evidence dates and may be newer.

Next scheduled review: 17 November 2026.

5 independently source-linked project/campus records; 0 independently source-linked facility/building records; 0 attributed or unresolved rows. These counts use different units and must not be added together.

Source families checked, selected records and remaining gaps

These notes name selected records, say which kinds of public evidence were checked and show what remains missing. They do not add anything to the published counts.

  • economic development incentives — Partly checked
    • The GO-Biz California Business Portal incentives page could not be read: secure connection handshake failure.
    • California Competes Tax Credit award lists were not yet reviewed directly, so any data center recipients there are unknown.
    • No county or city enterprise-zone, community-benefit or fee-credit programme was surveyed.

    Selected records

  • utility commission large load — Partly checked
    • PG&E's Electric Rule 30 transmission-interconnection application and its interim approval of 24 July 2025 were identified in search results but not yet reviewed directly.
    • No Silicon Valley Power electric service agreement, large-load tariff or City of Santa Clara council agenda report was read; the city web server blocked the projects listing.
    • SMUD, LADWP, Vernon Public Utility and Pittsburg Power Company large-load records were not searched.
    • CAISO and utility interconnection queues were not examined.

    Selected records

  • environmental construction permits — Checked
    • SCAQMD and SMAQMD permit databases were not searched at all, so Los Angeles basin and Sacramento generator permits are missing.
    • BAAQMD's own permit and public-notice database was not queried directly; only two BAAQMD documents reached through CEQAnet and the air district's CEQA letters directory were read.
    • Water withdrawal, discharge and stormwater construction general permit notices were not searched.
    • CEC opt-in certification and Application for Certification cases above 100 MW were not enumerated; one such certification is reported for the AVAIO Pittsburg site and was not read.

    Selected records

  • municipal planning assessor gis — Partly checked
    • CEQAnet's free-text query parameter is not honoured by the server on a plain GET, so no systematic keyword sweep of California CEQA documents for 'data center' was possible.
    • The City of Santa Clara web server could not be retrieved during review, so no Santa Clara planning file numbers or Silicon Valley Power agreements were read for the ten-plus Santa Clara projects in the current research record.
    • No county assessor or GIS parcel portal was queried for any California county; every parcel number here comes from a CEC or CEQAnet description.
    • San Jose's Legistar council record, where the Prologis STEM Park item would sit, was not reached.
    • Los Angeles, Irvine, El Segundo, Vernon, Newark, Fremont, Sacramento, San Diego and Imperial County planning portals were not searched.

    Selected records

  • tax abatement development agreements — Partly checked
    • No executed development agreement, ground lease or community benefits agreement document was opened.
    • The San Jose exclusive negotiating agreement or ground lease for the city-owned STEM Park parcel was not located on the city site.
    • Redevelopment successor agency and infrastructure financing district records were not searched.
  • operator disclosures — Partly checked
    • Microsoft, Google, Meta, Oracle and Apple location disclosures were not yet reviewed directly; the Microsoft sites here come from CEC and CEQAnet records instead.
    • Colocation operator location pages (Equinix, Digital Realty, CoreSite, STACK, Prime, NTT, Centersquare, Cologix, EdgeConneX, QTS, Serverfarm, Csquare, T5, DataBank, ScaleMatrix) were not retrieved; their facilities here rest on the Compute Atlas extract.
    • No operator sustainability or investor filing was checked for California-specific capacity.

    Selected records

  • open datasets directories — Checked
    • Data Center Map was not yet reviewed directly; no directory listing was used as evidence.
    • Compute Atlas leads not individually examined beyond the extract fields were not turned into research leads, including most Equinix, Digital Realty, Csquare, EdgeConneX, Lumen and CoreSite entries.
    • No cross-check against FracTracker, Baxtel, datacenters.com, Cloudscene or PeeringDB was attempted.

    Selected records

  • historical closures withdrawals names — Checked
    • No City of Coachella ordinance, resolution or minutes could be read, so the agreement termination and the reported permanent data center prohibition rest on a dataset lead only.
    • The City of Monterey Park letter documenting the 1977 Saturn Street cancellation did not respond during review.
    • Older California closures and demolitions — 1990s and 2000s carrier hotels, Herakles, Above.net and Savvis-era sites, and any data center lost to redevelopment — were not searched.
    • No archived or Wayback retrieval was attempted for retired operator pages.

    Selected records

  • news and other discovery — Partly checked
    • The Little Hoover Commission report and the Assembly oversight hearing materials were not read.
    • No systematic sweep of California local news for data center moratoria was done; moratoria are reported in Coachella and Imperial County and neither was confirmed from a government record.