Oklahoma index · last changed 13 September 2026

Oklahoma data centers: what the public record shows.

Selected source-linked records are published below. This is not a complete inventory of Oklahoma data centers.

1 published DataCenterData record · evidence status shown per row50 licensed directory leads · not independently verifiedOK

Explore Oklahoma

Map, listings and checked facts.

Start with 50 licensed source leads, then inspect the separate public-evidence layer below. Licensed rows are not independently verified and are not a statewide census.

Oklahoma map

Reported locations in Oklahoma

50 licensed rows · 23 source localities · 4 map targets

Open interactive map
Source-reported points; some are approximate. Not parcel boundaries. Exact Approximate or representative Bounded nearby group2 symbols are offset slightly for readability; thin connectors retain their projected anchors. Open the interactive map for source coordinates.
Browse 4 mapped areas as links
Map sources and method

The state outline is adapted from the U.S. Census Bureau 2025 cartographic boundary file. Facility coordinates are adapted from Compute Atlas by Edward Kubiak, edition 1.33.0, under CC BY 4.0. Outline and markers use one geographic projection before any explicitly disclosed readability offset. Exact singleton source anchors are never moved. A one-kilometre boundary tolerance prevents the simplified 1:20,000,000 outline from hiding legitimate border-area source points; farther conflicts are disclosed, not clamped. DataCenterData groups source-reported city coordinates only within a bounded map radius; the outline does not validate a facility record.

50 licensed rows23 reported city labels37 eligible organization labels

Browse all 50 rows below. Licensed rows are not independently verified and remain separate from the checked public-evidence layer.

  1. source-reported proposedCapacity not statedSource updated 14 September 2026approximate location
    View facility →dcd-dir-000035
  2. source-reported proposedPlanned 4 MWSource updated 2 September 2026approximate location
    View facility →dcd-dir-000069

Oklahoma evidence at a glance

A few checked sites

Selected public evidence, not a statewide census. Each row shows whether it is independently source-linked, attributed, or unresolved; licensed leads remain separate.

Published project / campus
1
Published facility / building
0
Attributed or unresolved rows
0
Licensed directory leads
50 not independently verified
Capacity boundary stated
0 of 1 published DataCenterData rows
Review timing
Audit through 12 September 2026 · next 12 March 2027
Known coverage gap

Oklahoma's statutory data center sales tax incentive and any recipient or certification list were not examined; the only lead to them, a Frontier article, was not yet reviewed directly.

Browse all 50 Oklahoma licensed leads → · Why these counts differ →

Projects

1 project record. Names are as they appear on each record page.

Meta Tulsa Data CenterOperator: Meta constructionproject UnknownNo independently supported figureThe government source gives no data-center MW value. More than 1,500 MW in the release concerns separate clean-energy projects adding energy to Oklahoma's grid, not this data center's IT capacity, service capacity, request or measured load. Meta Breaks Ground on New $1 Billion Data Center in Tulsa →Gov. record

Where the records were checked

Statewide audit pending

A few checked sites

This is not a list of every data center in the state, and the number here is not a count of them. There are almost certainly more.

Statewide coverage is not complete. The records below are sourced; a full statewide count has not been published.

State research audit window ended 12 September 2026. Individual records and claims below show their own evidence dates and may be newer.

Next scheduled review: 12 March 2027.

1 independently source-linked project/campus record; 0 independently source-linked facility/building records; 0 attributed or unresolved rows. These counts use different units and must not be added together.

Source families checked, selected records and remaining gaps

These notes name selected records, say which kinds of public evidence were checked and show what remains missing. They do not add anything to the published counts.

  • economic development incentives — Partly checked
    • Oklahoma's statutory data center sales tax incentive and any recipient or certification list were not examined; the only lead to them, a Frontier article, was not yet reviewed directly.
    • the current review did not include a broad discovery sweep for Oklahoma, so no search engine query could be run for this state; every source was reached by following a Compute Atlas source URL or by constructing an agency URL directly.
    • Oklahoma Department of Commerce incentive programme reports, Quality Jobs Program records and the Oklahoma Tax Commission ad valorem exemption reports were not reached.

    Selected records

  • utility commission large load — Partly checked
    • Case Processing Online is an Oracle APEX application that returns only a shell to a plain fetch, so no Oklahoma cause number, filing, tariff or order was read.
    • No PSO or OG&E large-load tariff, special contract or electric service agreement was obtained.
    • The Southwest Power Pool interconnection and large-load queues were not examined at all, so no Oklahoma research lead carries an interconnection figure.

    Selected records

  • environmental construction permits — Partly checked
    • deq.ok.gov failed secure connection certificate verification, so no air permit, permit application, public notice, water or construction permit was read.
    • Behind-the-meter generation at Oklahoma data centers, which the Governor's remarks in an operator release describe as enabled by new legislation, could not be checked against any permit.
    • No municipal building or grading permit portal was reached for any Oklahoma city.

    Selected records

  • municipal planning assessor gis — Checked
    • Only one city, Piedmont, was worked at the municipal level. Tulsa, Oklahoma City, Stillwater, Muskogee, Owasso, Claremore, Coweta, Inola, Lawton and Alva were not.
    • No county assessor or GIS parcel record was opened; the parcel account numbers recorded come from a PUD design statement, not from the assessor.
    • The Piedmont planning agenda packet, annexation petition and conceptual site plan published on the same portal were not yet reviewed directly.
    • Whether either Piedmont PUD was approved by the city council is not established; no minutes or approving ordinance was found.

    Selected records

  • tax abatement development agreements — Partly checked
    • No statewide Oklahoma registry of local development agreements or abatements was located, so this family cannot be swept the way Texas can.
    • The Springboard Tax Incentive Agreement itself is referenced in the plan with a blank date and was not obtained, so no executed agreement is in evidence.
    • Five-year ad valorem manufacturing exemption records held by the Oklahoma Tax Commission were not reached.

    Selected records

  • operator disclosures — Partly checked
    • Google, Meta, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services and Oracle location pages were not yet reviewed directly for Oklahoma.
    • No colocation operator page (TierPoint, TulsaConnect, RACK59, ValorC3, Isocentric, OCOSA) was opened.
    • Only one SEC filing was retrieved; IREN, Potentia and Jericho Energy Ventures filings naming Oklahoma sites were not.

    Selected records

  • open datasets directories — Checked
    • Data Center Map, Baxtel, datacenters.com, Cloudscene and PeeringDB were not consulted.
    • dcmap.us is cited by several Compute Atlas Oklahoma records and was not yet reviewed directly.
    • About 16 Oklahoma records, mostly Tulsa and Oklahoma City colocation halls, were read but not worked up as research leads.

    Selected records

  • historical closures withdrawals names — Partly checked
    • No primary cancellation, withdrawal or rescission record was obtained for any of the three; all three withdrawals rest on the dataset alone.
    • No archived operator page, acquisition filing or demolition record was searched for Oklahoma.
    • Renames and acquisitions were not systematically checked; the Core Scientific acquisition of Polaris DS LLC was found incidentally and remains unresolved against the Polaris Technologies facility.

    Selected records

  • news and other discovery — Partly checked
    • No Oklahoma news source was opened at all.
    • Local reporting on the Piedmont, Stillwater, Owasso and Coweta projects, which would carry hearing dates and vote outcomes, was not reached.

    Selected records