Public statement checked
Phase I of the Gilroy Data Center requires a 49 MW connection to PG&E.
Evidence limitation: Critical IT capacity
Claims · by topic
Checked claims about power
12 checked claims so far on this topic. Designed capacity, contracted demand, generation and metered load are different measures; a tariff is not a bill. Not a census of power claims or of data centers. Ratepayer evidence →
12 claims · newest check first
A verdict applies only to the wording shown.
Company claims are shown as stated; they are not findings.
Question answered
Treating DTE Electric's 1,000 MW Google contract as current measured load or critical IT capacity.
Evidence limitation: MPSC final disposition of U-22058
Question answered
Treating the requested 2,462 MW YGI Microgrid as issued generation capacity or data-center IT load.
Evidence limitation: Rescheduled hearing date and outcome
Question answered
What electricity-system costs has the Sabey Indianapolis petitioner committed to cover, and does that establish statewide customer protection?
Evidence limitation: Effects outside the reviewed site-specific commitment, including other tariffs, projects and wholesale-market costs…
Public statement checked
Fairfield Energy says it submitted an OPSB application for up to 1,350 MW of net gas generation and approximately 1,040 MW of battery storage.
Evidence limitation: Underlying application and staff report
Public statement checked
The natural-gas power facility described as adjacent to Vantage's planned Millersport campus means the campus will not affect electricity costs for local residents or businesses.
Evidence limitation: The underlying OPSB application, hearing outcome, certificate status, and future effect on retail bills.
Question answered
Treating Ohio's 85% data-center tariff as proof that residents cannot be affected by data-center-driven power costs.
Evidence limitation: Whether generation, transmission, wholesale-market or pre-tariff contracts can affect household bills remains a…
Public statement checked
Final NIPSCO agreement explicitly described as gating
Evidence basis: city-council record
Question answered
Reading Meta's nuclear agreements as dedicated plants directly wired to the New Albany campus.
Evidence limitation: none recorded.
Public statement checked
1 GW designed capacity
Evidence limitation: Contracted, energized and measured load.
Public statement checked
Meta says it will pay its full energy and utility costs
Evidence limitation: Utility contract and regulatory cost-allocation record.
Question answered
Reading Meta Lebanon's 1 GW design as current measured grid demand.
Evidence limitation: none recorded.
What this covers. 12 checked claims so far on this topic. They concern data-center projects in Indiana (5), Ohio (4), California (1), Michigan (1) and New Mexico (1). That is because those are the power claims DataCenterData has checked, not a count of claims or of data centers. Where a state, operator, project or topic shows no checked claim, read it as “not yet checked by DataCenterData”.
What a verdict means. A verdict applies only to the wording shown and the evidence linked on the check date. “Unknown” means the reviewed evidence did not establish the point; it never means zero or false.
All 57 checked claims and what they cover → · Corrections log →